So it been reported that some of the reason why Eli Drake was release was due to him being outspoken about his placement on the card and that the tipping point was that he refuse to do a intergender match that he didn’t know he was booked in and that’s when IMPACT management decided to release him. That’s old news but the new part of this is story is that now IMPACT is trying to impose him a 12 month non compete clause which mean that if they are successful, He won’T be able to sign with any major company for a full year.
We all complain about WWE and their method but to me this is even worst then anything WWE as done in the past. Eli Drake should be a superstar at this point and the new management of IMPACT pretty much destroyed him with their bad booking decision. Not only that but he might not be able to earn a decent living in wrestling for a year now. But i feel since it’s not WWE doing that nobody will be to outraged by this.
To be fair, the reason there isn’t as large a microscope on Impact is because so few people are watching and following the company’s moves.
Wasn’t Drake’s contract up at the end of May? I am pretty sure you can’t “punish” a talent by implementing a non-compete after their contract is up. I am aware of the shady practice by WWE and extending contracts for injured periods - but I’m lost as to how they could retroactively implement a 1 year non-compete, unless it was a bizarre stip in the initial contract.
yeah but they release him before is contract is up. So i’m guessing that they can actually punish a guy with a non compete clause since his contract didn’T run out before he got fired.
It’s here and you chose to comment on it…how is willful ignorance coming into play here?
Seemed like a clear case of non compliance to the ole “independent contractor is bad” narrative used for a whole week during Mania season…almost like there’s an entirely different set of rules here.
LOL no one brought you up…you decided to chime in genius. It’s almost like it’s a forum of some sorts where someone can say your opinion on the subject is clear wilful ignorance.