"Mr. McMahon" on Netflix discussion thread

You thought Steve Austin was a neurologist lol? He can barely string a sentence together

1 Like

I donā€™t know, I really liked his podcast and his network stuff. But yeah sounds like a moron in this.

I mean, heā€™s great at interviewing those types of people because of the way he talks.

He will say stuff like ā€œthat was one mean cat. So tell me what did you think about that time?ā€

Like nothing about that screams hes some intelligent human being

I donā€™t think the point of this is to learn new stuff. I donā€™t think we are. I suspect the truth is itā€™s aimed more non-wrestling fans to get an idea of this complicated and flawed individual.

For most of us who waste time on a wrestling board, we already know what heā€™s all about. So other than maybe getting some Talking Heads and seeing if somebody says an interesting tidbit, itā€™s rehashing stuff we already know.

2 Likes

John Stossel got what he deserves

To me the most interesting reason to watch this is Vince McMahon himself.

Itā€™s almost impossible that weā€™re ever gonna get him on camera again talking unless itā€™s a trial that is publicized. This is probably the last time youā€™re ever gonna see him talking on a documentary style video. So in that sense, this is as good as itā€™s gonna get.

One of the many unrelated topics on Billā€™s latest pod.

A six episode documentary about a wrestling promoter aimed at non-wrestling fans instead of the wrestling fans who will actually watch it. Why does the wrestling community keep doing this to itself?

3 Likes

Two not really spoiler-y thoughts so far:

Didnā€™t anybody tell Simmons after the Andre doc that Hoganā€™s Wrestlemania III story is bullshit?

When a documentary first mentions Dr. George Zahorian, you will see footage of the Warlord within 30 seconds. Every damn time.

Weā€™ll allow spoilers here.

1 Like

I know heā€™s important to early vince, but man thereā€™s too much Hogan in thisā€¦

Ok, I watched the first episode.

First, I have no idea what I saw when I logged into Netflix this morning, because this wasnā€™t the actual first minute lol.

I was entertained by the first episode, but at the same time there wasnā€™t anything I really didnā€™t know outside of Vince sharing some personal moments between him and his father. If anyone on this board is looking for something that is going to shed new light on everything, the first episode will not do that. Weā€™ll see where it goes.

I cringe every time I see the Montreal Screwjob footage

At this point, whenever the end of the world comes, there would still be stories and discussion of Montreal coming out after. :rofl:

3 Likes

Say what you want about Dave Meltzer but I thought he was fantastic in these episodes, just fact-checking the absurdities told in these. Thatā€™s something I wish couldā€™ve been in the ā€œWho Killed WCWā€ series, having those outside voices who covered it.

It hurts my head how Tony Atlas is in this so much until I realized that he is one of the few WWF stars from the 80ā€™s who is still alive :frowning:. For sure though when you think of the WWF in the 80ā€™s I think Tony Atlas is one of the last you think of.

Overall, it makes sense as a great series for a casual fan. For us who post on message boards this wasā€¦lacking outside of some inside shots and footages. I think there were three standouts to me:

  • Shane, as he is treated like Kendall Roy
  • Dave dropping a casual reference of how he was ā€œtalking to Vinceā€ because itā€™s one of those ā€œsecretsā€ of the industry (and I firmly believe he still has a way of communicating with Vince)
  • The various clips of Vince with the women talent. Itā€™s all sexual. I truly hope itā€™s more safe for the women talent in 2024.

I have many other thoughts but itā€™d wind up being a novel. Happy this existed and understand this likely will be the ā€œmostā€ we get from Vince. My hopes? When he dies itā€™s reveled that he kept an extensive set of journals or that he secretly did vlogs so we could et actual insight of Vince. Good or bad, heā€™s very captivating and was the wizard behind the theater we love.

Just finished. Plenty of the criticism that Iā€™ve seen has been fair, but I completely disagree that there is ā€œnothing newā€œ in these six or so hours. True, there were no big revelations, but Iā€™ve never heard Vince say at least half of the stuff that he says in this doc. As guarded as he is, itā€™s definitely the most open heā€™s ever been.

Overall, Iā€™d still call it a good and interesting watch. Glad I saw it, I wouldā€™ve survived if I didnā€™t.

Oh and Vince is a terrible person. Bury him under the jail if heā€™s found guilty.

3 Likes

The series overall seems to suffer from pivoting in purpose during production. Maybe this is the other side of the coin for what we keep hearing that the team didnā€™t have wrestling knowledge going in. From the outside, many of the story beats (Wrestlemania, the Monday Night War, etc.) have the type of drama that appeals to a documentary filmmaker.

I found it interesting that Vince is a fairly open book for the first half, then as we approach stories that havenā€™t been as canonized by WWE documentaries he gets a bit more evasive. Specifically the Sable lawsuit jumped out at me as an example. He claimed to remember more details about Rita Chatterton than he did about Sable. I did appreciate the editing that immediately showed they made it part of Sableā€™s return story. The lack of shame in telling the proposed Stephanie pregnancy angle is also revelatory and helps us see how Vince ultimately shares what he is proud of and conveniently forgets about what heā€™s not proud of.

They managed to obtain the interview footage that they have, and itā€™s been documented that they couldnā€™t really augment it to pivot to the topics that actually should be explored more in-depth. It feels like they had a choice to make, which is to still tell the story beats they had planned out before the 2022 reporting changed what could have been the focus of the story.

All told I can see Netflix pointing to this to say, in effect, hereā€™s a primer on our new programming partner and also the one problematic person from that organization is gone. Not necessarily the truth, but good enough for their purposes.

2 Likes

Iā€™m only two episodes in, but this is exactly my thoughts. I donā€™t believe Vince has ever admitted to having sex with Rita Chatterton before is one example (at least Iā€™ve never heard him say it) is one example.