Tony Khan on CM Punk’s WWE return: ‘It’s not something I can legally talk about’

Originally published at Tony Khan on CM Punk’s WWE return: ‘It’s not something I can legally talk about’

Tony Khan has said he cannot legally discuss CM Punk’s WWE return.

Steve Hermon of BBC West Midlands interviewed Khan to mark the beginning of ticket sales for AEW All In 2024 at Wembley Stadium.

The full interview is due to air on Tuesday, and will cover topics such as Sting, Fulham Football Club, and Will Ospreay. However, on Monday, Hermon published a short clip of the discussion on social media, concentrating on CM Punk.

The exchange is below:

Steve Hermon: I have to ask you about CM Punk. Of course, he was at All In and his last appearance for AEW was at All In at Wembley Stadium. We’ve now seen him appear at WWE Survivor Series at WarGames. Were you surprised to see him there?

Tony Khan: I can’t talk about that, nor do I think it’s the time or the place, but I appreciate you asking and I’m very excited about AEW All In at Wembley Stadium. Not to dodge or duck your question; it’s just not something I can legally talk about.

I had the chance to chat to #AEW owner Tony Khan about #AEWAllIn 2024 at Wembley Stadium ahead of tickets going on sale this week.

I’ll post the full interview tomorrow but we covered lots of topics, including Sting, Will Ospreay, Fulham FC and I had to ask about #CMPunkpic.twitter.com/1k2Jd5k5qh

— Steve Hermon (@SteveHermon) November 26, 2023

Wow! Shocking answer from Tony.

Insightful comments from Tony…as always

I get the legal part. But he sounds like such a disingenuous hack when he shills Wembley at the end of it.

(Unless he’s intentionally mocking Nick Khan for doing the same thing, in which case, I’m all for it because that guy sucks.)

1 Like

But, but his life was in danger…

1 Like

TK is such a little wanker. It’s the wrestling business, man. This sort of corporate cowardice is embarassing.

He was doing an interview about the on sale of All In, I’m pretty sure. Why wouldn’t he bring it back.

Also, what does he have to gain from commenting on it? Even if it wasn’t a legal thing. Anything the guy said - like everything he says - will be turned around or spun. It’s not worth it for him at this point.

He’s focusing on his business. Which, when he doesn’t focus on, he get gets criticized for.

3 Likes

It’s entirely possible that there is an NDA signed between them. You’ll know very well when Punk comes out today – if there’s no NDA there’s no way he doesn’t empty the clip. But if he does it in a classy manner and moves on, and just focus on the WWE you know full well it’s because he’s not allowed to.

Remember, if punk ever takes the classy road it’s because he’s being forced to.

2 Likes

This too.

Punk has taken tons of unwarranted shots at Hangman for the last 18 months, simply because legally, that’s the only person he could attack.

I presume, any exit agreement definitely understood not to give Punk absolutely any rope.

1 Like

I mean we can always hope that he starts off by saying

“I want to apologize to my former workplace for my behaviour. I was out of line. Now that I’ve been given a second chance I intend to make it right”

But it’s Punk

Like I said. If he can he’s unloading

1 Like

To be honest, I’m totally ok with Tony Khan not saying anything. Usually TK saying anything gets him in crap. What’s there to gain by talking about it?

4 Likes

“Poor Tony gets attacked no matter what he says.” As if he doesn’t go out of his way to hype up every mundane appearance as a special announcement, or ALMOST ALWAYS avoid the question he was asked to answer the one he wishes he were asked.

His hands may have been tied on this particular question, but he avoids questions when he doesn’t have to all of the time. He earns the attacks he gets for that bush league behavior because he literally runs the bush league.

1 Like

Tony has delivered on his announcements more than he has missed.

He’s also had huge signings with Edge and Will etc.

I think people like to attack him bc he’s an easy target - he’s awkward and comes across more as a passionate fan than business man.

The fact that Punk said nothing about AEW means their likely was an NDAA

2 Likes

Generally the only thing he doesn’t discuss is anything related to Punk / Brawl Out.

He literally speaks for hours at post PPV press conferences, giving pretty in depth answers.

1 Like

The man came on live TV and announced Punks firing and explained the process. That’s far more open than people give him credit for.

Again. Punk didn’t mention it either. Makes you think there is a reason

1 Like

Hangman makes it pretty clear via IG…

2 Likes

NDA or no NDA. These two had an ugly breakup, and while I get how it’s more entertaining to a fan to see them “shoot” on each other, I don’t think we should criticize either of them for acting professional and not taking more cheap shots. AEW is better off without Punk, and Punk is better of without AEW, it’s like a toxic relationship, it’s healthiest for both sides just to move on.

2 Likes

It’s also a function of if punk completely ignores his AEW run like he did in acts like he’s been away from wrestling for 10 years it almost sends a more potent message about where he ranks AEW relative to WWE

Same thing with if Tony doesn’t attack him it sends a message that he wasn’t a big enough deal to still worry about and he has bigger things to worry about

Categorically disagree on more announcements delivering than not, and especially not in the past year or so. He breaks the announcement trick out far too often, when he wants to (try to) pop a quarter-hour or juice a buyrate, and it’s been a running joke for months now – even with John and Wai.

And Copeland’s signing was big, sure, but I don’t recall it being a TK announcement. Will’s was an announcement – a talented guy who’s been on their past handful of major shows. I won’t quibble about it not being a more unexpected name, but his signing was more of a foregone conclusion IMO. But let’s put it on the board as a big announcement that lived up to the hype for once.

You know who else is awkward when talking to the press? Bill Belichick. And when the organization he runs was on top, the non-answers and dismissiveness during press conferences was just part of his charm. Now that the Patriots suck, his non-answers about decisions made during losses are being scrutinized.

Being awkward isn’t a crime, or even that much of a problem in his public-facing persona. But we can’t use his awkwardness as a crutch when he goes out of his way to do as much media as he does. And while most of his avoidances and non-answers are Punk-related, it’s not all of them. But hey, everything’s “great” and “exciting” in AEW land despite the soft ticket sales, lack of depth at the top of the card, etc.

I would agree that some of his announcements have missed. Promoting a huge announcement for All in, especially for American television, where, virtually none of those fans are going to attend, was a bit lame.

Outside of that though he usually delivers. He’s brought in way more free agents then have gone the other way.

In my opinion the sports owner he is most like is Mark Cuban. He’s bombastic, a bit annoying and goofy and an easy target. Everyone has the “rich kid” who will lose money to have fun vibes from both.

Tony is an easy target. He’s passionate and sometimes says things he shouldn’t. He’s not polished like Nick Khan is. He’s highly memable with how he looks.

Still he’s doing a great job overall and if people stopped to think before attacking him versus true scum like Vince and Dana they would see how ridiculous they are being.

2 Likes