Her treatment by creative might be due to for the same reasons as Dolph. She has a grating personality in the back that is a huge turn off to creative. Dolph in real life is very cringey and does very douchey things all the time. I have heard everyone mocks him all the time. Becky is 31 going on 13. She comes off as mentally challenged and its always a bad idea when she talks.
She isn’t that talented and probably rubs creative the wrong way like Dolph does.
Not really that complicated. I don’t automatically become a fan of the talentless because of their look. I guess Vince is at least consistent across both genders.
I thought she was being help back for her bad choices in ring gear. That flame one piece is not aesthetically appealing at all. some one should tell Carmella that also.
Your bar of what’s considered talented is seriously low. I will say though that at least Alexa is a good promo. When it comes to Trish though… everyone who actually knows the past rather than WWE’s revised version of the past knows how she became popular.
And becoming a “decorated wrestler” doesn’t really prove anything in the WWE as, outside of kayfabe, you’re just being picked to be champion rather than actually winning it. And then even within kayfabe it doesn’t make sense especially when only concerning one title as you have to lose it to win it again so bragging about being a multiple time champion doesn’t make much sense. All that however is more to do with the generally illogical way wrestling is presented but it’s still hilarious you brought it up as a way of defending Trish as somehow getting over on talent.
Who people think are good or bad is subjective. It’s not something scientific. And “people in pro-wrestling” having a differing opinion doesn’t mean their opinion can’t be challenged especially when it’s lacking in logic. And even when talking about “people in pro-wrestling” they don’t somehow look at Trish Stratus as a great in ring wrestler. You’ll hear she improved a lot but that’s mainly because she was absolutely shocking to start off with.
That doesn’t even make sense as a response to what I’ve said… You don’t like to question WWE’s methods, ideas or revisionism at all and even in other threads suggest that fans thinking is an issue which is weird as you’re on a forum.
No offence, but you’re really not that smart. Are you American?
I’ve never seen or heard anyone with any credibility suggest Trish was a good wrestler just like no one with any credibility suggests Sable or Alexa or Mandy Rose or the Bella twins are great or even good wrestlers. And even if they did, like I said, it’s still subjective. You’re allowed to think Trish was a magnificent technician if you want, you’re wrong but you’re allowed to be. Just like people are allowed to think Cena is a great in ring wrestler. It shows low standards but if that’s you then fair enough.
You say that people can’t disagree with or challenge what “the experts” say then you turn around and pretend that I’m suppressing your opinion?
I didn’t say you shouldn’t be on forum because you have a WWE approved opinion, I said if you don’t think discussion is allowed because “the experts hath written it in stone” then why are you on a forum. A quite obvious difference.
All this because you think Mandy Rose is a peak Kurt Angle level wrestler.
At least someone noticed how popular Becky Lynch could be… I guess WWE are just late at figuring out what the fans want. They’re hopeless at reading a crowd.